When
Open, Honest Communication Spells Career Suicide
|
What would you do if you were
a school director and discovered a less than favorable review of your
school on the ISR web site? Would you threaten with
a lawsuit? Ferret out the teacher that submitted the review and terminate
their contract? Staunchly conclude anyone unhappy is nothing more than
a complainer? Or, maybe you’d even
do all of these things, as a few directors have already.
Of course,
there
is
an
infinitely
better
way to respond.
As a concerned professional you could model enlightened
leadership and consider the review a signal to meet with your staff
and resolve the issues. You could even initiate dialogue with other international
directors and seek guidance on how to improve your leadership
skills or solve particular problems at your school. Our hunch
is that directors who would respond in this manner are not
receiving negative reviews on
ISR because
they
are
already
doing the right thing.
Since its inception
in 2004, more than one international educator has lost their job after
being accused of posting to the ISR web site. Most
alarming, we recently reviewed a school contract that had been updated
to include a clause allowing for immediate dismissal of any teacher
who speaks or writes
words
perceived to be critical of the operation of their school – whether
the words are true or false is of no concern. Another contract stated
that teachers cannot, under threat of dismissal, fraternize with parents
and/or members
of the
board. Surely such clauses are not
reflective of the lofty mission statements so proudly displayed by the
same schools.
It perplexes us that the
very people who should be fostering and modeling the free interchange
of ideas and information are the very people
refusing to accept there just may be a problem or two
at their schools. We conclude such people have their
own agendas, be it financial or personal. Either way, hiring well-educated
professionals
and expecting them to settle for less than fair treatment and dedicated,
professional leadership is absurd.
As an international educator I encountered more than one director who
promoted and endorsed all aspects of constructive dissent and freedom
of expression – just
not at their schools! Realizing their staff was beginning to question
their agendas, these directors chose to quell and dismiss rumblings
among
their faculty
as the rustling of a few “never happy” teachers. Of course,
this personality belongs to a small minority of directors whose
only toehold on leadership is the power granted them through
the board of directors, who may actually support and endorse their
director's actions based on their own motives.
Fortunately, we hear of
directors who, when confronted with a review that does not coincide
with their opinion of themselves and their school,
react like true professionals. One teacher wrote: “After reading
a review that pointed out problems at our school the director sent a
copy of the review to the entire staff. She asked us to read the review
and, if so motivated, submit a review of our own that either defended
the school or concurred with the current review, depending, of course,
on how we perceived the situation.” The teacher goes on to relate
how this approach afforded a balanced view of the school. The teacher
states that this director modeled the very essence of the school’s
mission statement, further winning the respect of her staff.
Consider the following statements
taken from ISR reviews. Would you support the directors of these schools
or would you encourage these schools
and directors to initiate serious self-evaluation and change?
|
• Many
teachers were yelled at, insulted, and threatened at various
times throughout
the year.
• Grades can be changed
without the teacher's knowledge or approval.
• This is a school
with no vision for education and no rules of ethics to follow.
Curriculum resources are almost completely illegally photocopied.
• If I had a problem
with a student or a parent it was looked at like it was my fault.
• There is very little
academic integrity because everyone is supposed to pass with
a good to excellent
grade.
• When we got there we were instructed to sign a
new contract -- a local-hire contract. Even though we were hired
at a U.S. conference they said we had first approached the school
for
a
job while vacationing
in the country. The pay scale was 50% lower and had no insurance
benefits. We refused. The vindictive director
blackballed
us
at
every recruiting agency he could. His move was supported and we had
no recourse.
• In one situation
he said to a teacher, “Who
are you to question my authority?"
• High staff turnover,
resource shortages and an administrative and decision making
system that
is mired down in paperwork and cleverly designed to lead nowhere.
• Teachers' two-year
contracts were declared null and void after one year and "new" contracts
were issued with different terms of service. Teachers, who would
not sign the second contract, were told they would forfeit their
annual salary increase.
• Another teacher
was beaten up in an alley by a group of boys. He was fired, because
the kids
didn't like him. No joke.
• This is unfortunately
one of those schools where the kids and their parents have all
the power.
• Water was thrown
on a teacher because she refused to change grades at the request
of a parent
and older sibling.
• I was absolutely
SHOCKED at the sophisticated level of cheating and bribing amongst
students.
Many of us were so naive, or didn't want to believe the reviews
we read online, only to arrive and find a literal HELLHOLE, attempting
to pass itself off as an educational institution.
• Why did the school
owners have new cars and a grand wedding that year when I could
not even
get any text books?
|
|
It seems obvious that when
a director says "unhappy teachers are nothing more than complainers",
they are acting very much like students who, when caught red handed,
insist “It
wasn’t
me”.
If open communication between faculty and administration is not effective,
or could spell career suicide for an educator, we encourage the use
of the ISR web site as a platform through which the free exchange
of information
can take place
in an open and safe environment. Although some school directors carry
on as if ruling small fiefdoms, receiving blind support by various
organizations, ISR remains dedicated to supporting the rights and
well being of educators.
We invite you to join
us.
|