European Schools and Quality?
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:53 pm
I am a long time reader of this forum but a first time poster. I've noticed that a lot of the discussions tend to focus around schools outside Western Europe. I don't read a lot of posts about schools in Paris, London, Brussels, or Berlin. It makes me wonder if problems/issues don't really exist there, or if they do, they simply aren't posted here. However, I digress...
I guess I have a curious question--perhaps it might be a paradox. If, for example, the more generous the package leads to a higher quality of teacher/instruction (as a previous post suggests, with mixed responses), how does one explain the overall excellent quality of Western European schools? I have been out of the international circuit for about eight years now, but my wife (who is also a teacher) and I are thinking strongly about returning in a year or two. When I went through the Search job fair eight years ago I had a number of interviews with Western European schools, but there packages were so financially weak, I could not honestly consider any of their offers (the salary did not even cover my student loans, so I would have defaulted if I would have accepted a contract).
I ended up taking a job at a South American school with a fairly strong package, but I've always wondered about those Western European schools. My wife is just about finished with Ed school, we are debt free (yeah, baby) and we have a two year-old son, and as we ponder the places we might be able to live, should we even consider Western Europe? We are strongly interested in Italy (OK, some might argue this is Southern Europe not Western Europe) and France but could we honestly live there and plan out our retirement and save for our son's college education? And more importantly, if not us, then who are the people taking these jobs? My only guess is that they have no debts and no dependents, unless of course the financial packages in these countries have changed (but judging by the posts, they haven't).
Which brings me to my original question (I said I was a first time poster--I promise I'll be more brief in later posts!)--if, for example, I am a director at a top rated international school in Paris, I probably have some very influential parents who have high expectations for their children (i.e. IB and AP passing rates are very important). Therefore, I will want to attract the most powerful and influential international teachers out there. However, if I am offering them peanuts compared to Asian and Middle Eastern schools, am I really attracting the best teachers out there? When I was at the job fair eight years ago, I noticed a number of single teachers who were looking to travel overseas to "find themselves and have an adventure" as opposed to making a serious career choice. Many of them did not have much teaching experience, but they could afford to take the paltry sums offered by Western European schools. I noticed that many of the more experienced, stable teaching couples did not take offers by European schools for the very same reasons I could not--they simply do not pay enough to make a solid living on in order to raise a child and plan for retirement (or in my case, pay off student loans). Are these schools short-changing themselves due to their desirable locations, or, is money not as important as some of us think it is?
Of course, generalizations abound in a post such as this, so I apologize to those single teachers without dependents and without loans who are serious teachers who do amazing jobs (and there are many of you--probably teaching in Western Europe) ...however, how do European schools compete for the best teachers if they don't pay much?
I guess I have a curious question--perhaps it might be a paradox. If, for example, the more generous the package leads to a higher quality of teacher/instruction (as a previous post suggests, with mixed responses), how does one explain the overall excellent quality of Western European schools? I have been out of the international circuit for about eight years now, but my wife (who is also a teacher) and I are thinking strongly about returning in a year or two. When I went through the Search job fair eight years ago I had a number of interviews with Western European schools, but there packages were so financially weak, I could not honestly consider any of their offers (the salary did not even cover my student loans, so I would have defaulted if I would have accepted a contract).
I ended up taking a job at a South American school with a fairly strong package, but I've always wondered about those Western European schools. My wife is just about finished with Ed school, we are debt free (yeah, baby) and we have a two year-old son, and as we ponder the places we might be able to live, should we even consider Western Europe? We are strongly interested in Italy (OK, some might argue this is Southern Europe not Western Europe) and France but could we honestly live there and plan out our retirement and save for our son's college education? And more importantly, if not us, then who are the people taking these jobs? My only guess is that they have no debts and no dependents, unless of course the financial packages in these countries have changed (but judging by the posts, they haven't).
Which brings me to my original question (I said I was a first time poster--I promise I'll be more brief in later posts!)--if, for example, I am a director at a top rated international school in Paris, I probably have some very influential parents who have high expectations for their children (i.e. IB and AP passing rates are very important). Therefore, I will want to attract the most powerful and influential international teachers out there. However, if I am offering them peanuts compared to Asian and Middle Eastern schools, am I really attracting the best teachers out there? When I was at the job fair eight years ago, I noticed a number of single teachers who were looking to travel overseas to "find themselves and have an adventure" as opposed to making a serious career choice. Many of them did not have much teaching experience, but they could afford to take the paltry sums offered by Western European schools. I noticed that many of the more experienced, stable teaching couples did not take offers by European schools for the very same reasons I could not--they simply do not pay enough to make a solid living on in order to raise a child and plan for retirement (or in my case, pay off student loans). Are these schools short-changing themselves due to their desirable locations, or, is money not as important as some of us think it is?
Of course, generalizations abound in a post such as this, so I apologize to those single teachers without dependents and without loans who are serious teachers who do amazing jobs (and there are many of you--probably teaching in Western Europe) ...however, how do European schools compete for the best teachers if they don't pay much?