50 and over can not be hired in Germany?

[Heliotrope]

PsyGuy wrote:
> @Thames Pirate
>
> Why would I submit to some kind of challenge by you, masters do not answer
> to novices.

Haha!
So sad and immature.
But ok, that's part of being a troll of course.

[Heliotrope]

Kind of interested in the quiz answers now actually...

"What is interesting about this pedigree?"
Well, most of the horses' names in the pedigree are quite interesting.
But I know weird names are sort of the norm for horses.

[PsyGuy]

@Heliotrope

I know right, like who would think that some member is obligated to participate some other members quiz show, just more TPF.

[Thames Pirate]

Standard troll--all talk and no substance. When given an opportunity to prove otherwise, all excuses.

But sure, people totally believe you aren't a liar and a fraud . . . .

[Heliotrope]

PsyGuy wrote:
> @Heliotrope
>
> I know right, like who would think that some member is obligated to
> participate some other members quiz show, just more TPF.

'Joke' all you want, your behaviour towards @Thames Pirate is very childish. You can't handle it when people prove you wrong, and I guess @Thames Pirate has done so too many times, so you've come up with your standard TPF rebuttal whenever she disagrees with you. A fragile inflated ego and a lack of emotional maturity – maybe you should run for president?

[Illiane_Blues]

Thames Pirate wrote:
> Standard troll--all talk and no substance.

Agree

[Thames Pirate]

Illiane_Blues wrote:

> Agree

Apparently the requirements for becoming an expert are claiming expertise and providing absolutely no information, insight, or proof. So is this where we all get to claim to be experts in whatever we want.

In addition to horses I am an expert in underwater basket weaving, Neptune, Ancient Etruscan language, and theoretical astrophysics.

Anyone else want to share theirs? It could be fun to see what you all know, and no actual knowledge is required!

[PsyGuy]

@Heliotrope

@Thames Pirate is the one thats been proven wrong, with their own sources, now has @Thames Pirate ever been right. Its just more TPF.

@Thames Pirate

I only post from experience, research and trusted and reliable sources.

[Heliotrope]

Who wins an argument sometimes subjective.
All I can say is that in most discussions you've had with @Thames Pirate, I would say she had the more convincing arguments.

[PsyGuy]

@Heliotrope

No, its not subjective, only data matters.
We disagree, or if you want a more "subjective" declaration, I find your position lacking in merit, and unpersuasive.

[Heliotrope]

You're usually the one refusing to provide us with your sources to verify your claims, so yes, we disagree.

[PsyGuy]

@Heliotrope

Do youre own research, I only post from personal experience, research and reliable and trusted sources.

[wrldtrvlr123]

PsyGuy wrote:
> @Heliotrope
>
> Do youre own research, I only post from personal experience, research and reliable
> and trusted sources.
=====================
Ah, yes, " Do youre own research" (sic). The motto of all rational, logical, scientific minds throughout history.

[Heliotrope]

wrldtrvlr123 wrote:
> Ah, yes, " Do youre own research" (sic). The motto of all rational,
> logical, scientific minds throughout history.

Indeed.
That could also be the single answer to all questions posted here: "Do your own research!"

[PsyGuy]

@WT123

Yes, what do you think I owe you? Are you entitled to something, do I bare you some obligation. Do you believe you have some right that I must fulfill for you.