How are you preparing for retirement financially?

[PsyGuy]

@Sid

Jelly Much... If you have data thats a valid statement, but your claim is supported by nothing more than suspicion, of a member who is more successful than you. Dont be Jelly.

[sid]

Do you have data to support your claim that this member is more successful than I am?
Jelly belly.

[PsyGuy]

@sid

Yes, 1) Your Jellyness, 2) As the bard says, I think tho does protest too much.

[vincentchase]

@PsyGuy, isn't there a rule (ethical or otherwise) about not using two handles on a discussion forum?

[sid]

Protest too much? Oh my. What a low bar you set for other people's protests.

[PsyGuy]

@vincentchase

I dont know, but I only and have only posted from this user name and account on this forum.

@Sid

Higher bar than yours is for determining if a member is inflating their dossier. Prove me wrong, do you have any data that indicates the OP is mis-repping their qualifications, or is it as I wrote, just your suspicion?

[vincentchase]

Then the guy you're defending has amazingly similar syntax, an equally poor understanding of financial markets and gravitates toward ego-driven delusion bubbles. Peas in a pod.

[sid]

Peas. Jelly. Lots of food going round this thread.
And it does smell like fish.

I’m hardly motivated to prove anything. Rather pointless to try even, as the end game would have to be me providing my balance sheet, and that won’t be happening.

Enjoy your game, little boys. Or should I say, little boy?

[PsyGuy]

@vincentchase

Sticks & Stones

@sid

Nice red hearing but you dont have to do that at all, you dont have to provide any data whatsoever on your finances, what you would have to do is provide data that the OP inflated themselves somehow, and by data something more than some leadership admins sniff test.

[sid]

I don’t have to do that at all. If you’re in the mood for proof, do it yourself. I’m perfectly happy with my beliefs and feel no need to jump through your hoops.
You might start by reviewing this thread. (Note how I avoid telling you what you “have” to do.) Another poster already did a pretty good job of identifying issues.

[PsyGuy]

@sid

I didnt claim you had too, I stated you WOULD have too, do you know the definition of would?

I have read the post thread, while its a tight time line and its not unrealistic, nor are any of the motivations or financial strategy unrealistic.

[sid]

It’s good that you’re satisfied.

[PsyGuy]

@Sid

::cue pink panther soundtrack::

More like comfortable not being 'Sid, Conspiracy Hunter.. The case of the CFP teacher'.

[Heliotrope]

Fact remains that @OF2018 hasn't responded yet, and it is indeed an unlikely story, as explained by @vincentchase
But maybe we're all too distrustful. Either way, let's move on, unless @OF2018 wants to chime in.

[PsyGuy]

Concur with @Heliotrope, without engagement, were just armchairing the issue.