Cambridge Diary 2015

[wrldtrvlr123]

PsyGuy wrote:
> @wrldtrvlr123
>
> Obviously he does and his expression is a manifestation of his experience,
> and while you dont share that experience, and you may grow frustrated from
> it, makes it no less valid or logical to them. There is nothing wrong with
> negative (or positive) over generalization, some events and phenomenon are
> very general, and while one perception of the IE world is small, its not
> unreasonable to generalize ones individual experience. Your position seems
> to be that because one contributors experience is ina perceived minority
> that its expression should be limited, and that having expressed it, youve
> had enough.
>
> I have never expressed that anyone (even the League of PsGuy Nemesis) not
> contribute, I often write that we need more not fewer voices on this forum.
------------------------------
LOL. I meant that you are the only one that I ever recall being nominated for exile from this (and other sites) which I opposed obviously. I'll always defend your right to make a fool of yourself. :D

[PsyGuy]

@wrldtrvlr123

Well then my apologies for misunderstanding. In that regard your absolutely correct.

[Climberman]

@Psyguy

There is nothing wrong with me. Your assumption is pretty insulting.

Maybe you should think about your comments and perceptions before you comment on senator's or shadowjack's or...

Do me a favor and please don't reply to any of my posts unless you can be constructive and have something important to say.

[PsyGuy]

@Climberman

Im not insulting you. I am being informative and constructive, there really is something wrong, and its almost always an issue with the candidate, either something your not saying, something your hiding, or some aspect/characteristic you dont realize. Regardless of your feelings the assumption is correct, its you, we just need to find out what about you it is.